A case recently decided by the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire — although not an alarm company case — relied heavily on law created in cases involving alarm companies.
A case recently decided by the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire — although not an alarm company case — relied heavily on law created in cases involving alarm companies.
The case included an animal hospital and a supplier of laboratory services and medical equipment. The dispute concerned the plaintiffs’ dissatisfaction with the quality of certain services and equipment provided to it by the defendant, and its unhappiness over the plaintiffs’ termination of the business relationship. The plaintiffs’ claim against defendant was for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and unjust enrichment. The defendant’s counterclaim against the plaintiffs was for breach of contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, plus a claim for unjust enrichment against the plaintiffs and certain related corporate entities.