Where Can We Put all This?
by Russ Gager
May 1, 2008
As video needs and resolutions increase, storage
of security data becomes an issue.
 |
| Craig Suter, IT systems manager for Deterrent
Technologies Inc., installs hard drives into an IP video server and tests it on
one of the company’s test benches before installation at a customer’s site. |
|
Megapixel cameras and high frame rates are
creating “mega-storage” needs for security system data. Although storage costs
are decreasing, end users’ expectations of the resolutions, frame rates and
time period of video and other data they can store are escalating to the extent
that the savings in storage are spent on additional capacity.
Although videotape is still used in some VCR systems, depending on the size of
the security system, DVRs or network video recorders (NVRs) may be sufficient
for video storage. Options with larger capacities include network-attached
storage (NAS) and storage area networks (SANs).
NAS solutions are computers dedicated to data storage. SANs are networks of
storage devices that could include servers and digital tape libraries that may
be remotely located but can be accessed as if they are locally attached.
Most storage options in new installations are on hard drive disks, although
digital tape is recommended by some for archiving.
Security dealers, systems integrators and manufacturers are discovering
innovative solutions to these storage challenges. For example, Pro-Tec,
Minneapolis, says it coined the term “intelligent video appliance” for a
storage solution it implemented for a customer that cost one-third of another
solution. Essentially, the company created the data-network equivalent of a
railroad siding and stashed a series of data boxcars there as an independent
branch of the end user’s IT network.
“We went outside their box, their standards, and created a stand-alone
network,” explains Jeff Duchac, Pro-Tec’s manager of engineering services. This
company’s IT department, like many, required any device put on its IT network
to be rigorously tested.
By installing dual network interface cards (NICs), the security network
“siding” could be separated from the IT department’s network. This meant that
cameras, access controllers and other security devices that had not been
rigorously tested by the IT department could be attached because they were on a
separate network.
“We built our own infrastructure, provided our own network-attached storage,
patch panels, Cat 5 and 6 cabling, provided our own midspans and switches,”
Duchac notes. “We even went so far as to make our Cat cables a different color,
so they could distinguish between the building systems’ and security provider’s
wires in trays, so there would be less confusion when trying to do
troubleshooting.”
This enabled network video recorders to be located in data closets on each of
the company’s four floors instead of sending video surveillance and access
control data through fiber-optic cable to a centralized data server room, an
option that would have been three times as expensive.
Installing the NVRs closer to the security devices made the fiber-optic
installation unnecessary. Each NVR on each floor had 1 terabyte (TB) of storage
capacity with RAID 5 recording, which makes a backup copy across several hard
drives of everything recorded. So capacity was increased to 4 TB by the NVR on
each floor. Additional cost savings were realized by using third-party rather
than name-brand hardware.
“So you keep your finance people happy, your IT folks happy and all the
players,” Duchac concludes. “It seemed to really work out good. I think that
you’re going to see more and more of that type of environment or solution.”
Another tip Duchac recommends is using RAID 5 instead of mirroring. Mirroring
is using one additional hard drive to make a backup copy instead of several.
When several hard drives are used for backup, they can be writing portions of
the data at the same time. The risk of loss also is spread over several drives.
But mirroring uses a single hard drive for backup and therefore is slower,
Duchac maintains.
DRIVE DATA CAREFULLY
 |
| Storage is being installed in racks by North
American Video at the Wynn Hotel in Macau, China, shown here under
construction. |
|
A tip from Paul Nowak, chief technical officer
for Security Services and Technologies (SST), Norristown, Pa., and Mike Ficco,
a global engineer, is using NVR software that does not include storage media.
That way, the integrator or customer can supply whatever media is compatible
with the system.
“We’ll take a server and put in the storage that we want,” Nowak points out.
“If they send out a box to you and that’s your NVR, that limits you; you get
what you get, and you can’t plan for the future.”
They also suggest dropping storage from a competitive bid because sometimes the
customer, if it is a large enough corporation, can obtain storage at a better
price than an integrator can.
“On recent projects I’ve dealt with, we have to supply the price, and they
could get the same PC for less because their distribution channels are so cost-effective
for them,” Ficco observes. “We buy a lot of volume, but they buy even more,
because they’re Fortune 100 companies. They supply computers to all their
20,000 to 30,000 employees.”
“Some of our customers are very large – DuPont or Dow,” reveals Nowak. “We buy
a couple million dollars worth of PC equipment a year, but that pales by
comparison with DuPont.”
The inverse of this is that sometimes – when storage is needed quickly – the
integrator can supply it rapidly without all the approvals of the expenditure a
large corporation may need.
Another factor is that some IT departments only accept hardware that they have
rigorously tested. “When we go on their network, a lot of companies have
stipulations that they have tested equipment, and they have all the standards
for it,” Ficco reports. “We need to supply this computer, because they have it
tested, and it meets all their requirements.”
One company’s testing process required three months. “Every server they put on
the network would go through that three-month process before it’s billed as
approved for use,” Ficco emphasizes. “Every time they make a change, they are
tied by the regulation internally and externally.”
When that is the case, and the integrator is unfamiliar with the equipment the
company requires, it may be better if the customer supplies the hardware. If
the customer supplies storage for video, the hard drives must be designed for
the continuous duty that video requires, even though such drives sometimes cost
twice as much as standard data drives.
One customer Nowak mentions was not using continuous duty drives. “We were
replacing two to three hard drives a year,” he complains. “Even though the
hardware is built to last, it is constantly running.”
If data drives are used, they probably will break down too frequently, and
because of the continuous operation they were providing, any warranty on their
use would be voided.
“We send them back, and they can tell,” Ficco insists. “If it was only
purchased four to six months ago, they know this wasn’t used under normal
circumstances, because after six months, it looks like it’s been in there for
five years. They’re going to see your guys really got the wrong hard drive, and
they can’t warrant it, because it’s not designed for that.”
The two also recommend advising customers that their storage requirements will
continue escalating over the years and they need a system that can expand.
“If you have a customer who has a couple hundred cameras, and they want to have
a unified location where they go to one box and look at all the archive of
those cameras, you have to be thinking in terms of petabytes,” Nowak insists.
“Terabytes are way too small.”
Many questions need to be answered before deciding on a method of off-site storage,
advises Michael Glasser, PSP CISSP, an engineer for Deterrent Technologies
Inc., Ocean, N.J., a global security integrator with more than 25 years of
experience.
“The questions come down to: Why do you want it stored; how long do you want it
stored for; where do you want it stored; how often do you access it; and how
quickly do you need to access it?” Glasser enumerates. “All those things will
determine the type of storage.”
A tip he recommends is not using hard drives for longer-term storage because
more efficient media for static storage are available. “Hard drives are good
for data that is often changing, where surveillance video is static data that
should never change once written,” Glasser maintains.
“Today, the typical storage for the industry is a hard drive inside your NVR or
DVR,” he reports. “That’s where people keep it. They don’t back it up and just
let it live there.”
USE TAPES FOR THE LONG-TERM
 |
| Casinos require massive amounts of storage, such
as these DVRs at the Wynn Hotel in Las Vegas, installed by North American
Video. |
|
For longer-term storage, Glasser recommends
using digital tapes and even shipping them to off-site storage. “If you want to
stick it away and don’t mind waiting a day or two to retrieve it, off-site
storage is good for long-term,” he points out. “I’m a big fan of off-site
storage.”
Supermarkets are typical users of long-term storage, up to a year, for the
purpose of slip-and-fall claims. Most offices typically only need 30 days of
storage, Glasser maintains.
His advice is to stream lower-quality video for viewing to save bandwidth and
archive high-resolution video of the same events. Additionally, customers may
wish to stream lower-frame-rate video off-site to a third-party location in
real time.
“I’m a fan of having multiple storage levels and places,” he notes. “That way
if something catastrophic happens, you have something that’s at least current.”
He recommends storage at the edge of a system in hard drive or flash memory in
cameras or on servers in network closets to save bandwidth, as long as the
servers do not have to be accessed too often or are easily accessible if they
do.
“In the camera you could have a day of storage, in the closet a week, and in
your SAN or data center you’d have a month of storage,” Glasser suggests as a
method to create inherent backup and redundancy in the system.
Glasser believes solid-state storage will inherit the earth. “I honestly
believe hard drives are going away in the near future,” he predicts. “I don’t
know in how many years.”
Sidebar: Third-Party Storage Is an Option
Scott Wulforst, integrated sales manager for A-1
Security Inc., Sparks, Nev., has a tip for integrators: offer customers
third-party remote storage. Approximately 80 percent of his company’s video
surveillance jobs include some IP equipment.
“A lot of the systems are hooked up with a new manufacturer that does remote IP
storage for us in two redundant locations,” Wulforst reports. This provides
off-site protection for security data and allows archiving of it on a regular
schedule after its initial storage period of up to two weeks is over.
“It’s a lot cheaper to have their own off-site storage,” maintains Sandy
Kanaeholo, A-1’s installation operations manager. “They can use it for
everything else, and it costs them less in the long run. You don’t have a piece
of machinery you have to physically maintain, and you get your software updates
for free.
“You calculate the amount of backup time you have on the existing drive on a
DVR, and you can have scheduled backup or they can do a manual backup, archive
a file and transfer it over by network to the off-site source,” Kanaeholo
explains.
Sidebar: Uninterruptible Power Supplies Are Necessary and Profitable
|
|
| One of these rack-mounted 5kVA double conversion uninterruptible power supplies (UPSs) has a transformer to step the 208V input down to 120V. Another is providing 208V input and output on its own. |
|
A major enemy of data storage is interruptions,
surges or fluctuations in electrical power, which can cause loss of data. These
include power spikes and changes in frequency on the electrical line, such as
harmonic distortions.
A variety of uninterruptible power supplies (UPSs) are available to prevent
this. They usually include batteries to supply backup electrical power and
varying amounts of power conditioning depending on the type and level of
protection needed.
A basic standby UPS simply provides backup power during an outage. These are
used more in very small commercial and residential applications.
Some UPSs use a technology called line interactive, which regulates AC power
and corrects the voltage, either adding to it or restraining it as needed.
Others use a process called dual conversion. These online UPSs convert AC
electrical power to DC and then back to AC to produce “clean” power without
fluctuations that might harm sensitive digital devices.
Usually dual-conversion UPSs cost the most, but they also provide the most
protection. The savings in damage they prevent from one power failure can pay
for them.
Although they can provide power during blackouts, UPSs are not used as much for
backup power as to shut down systems safely when a power outage occurs.
Auxiliary generators are used for longer-term backup power, and because of
fluctuations in their power, especially when starting up, use of electrical
line conditioning products is recommended.
“The power that a generator produces tends to not be as clean as what you can
get from utility power,” Mroczka asserts. “When I am talking to a customer who
says they are working with a generator, I will always go to double conversion.”
She also recommends double conversion for voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP)
phone systems.
Run time — how long equipment can be powered by a UPS — can be calculated by
the amount of electrical power the equipment connected to it needs. Some
manufacturers have calculators for run time on their Web sites.
Standalone UPS products can fit under a desk and are used frequently with DVRs
and other security equipment that is located in an office environment. Other
types can be installed in racks with video surveillance and security equipment.
In some installations, each rack has its own UPS regulating power to that rack.
 |
| UPSs deliver protection from electrical problems, such as spikes, surges, sags and brownouts, in desktop, under-console and rack-mount models. |
|
“It really depends each and every time on the
customer’s specific needs,” points out Mroczka. “The size and scope of the UPS
is dependent not so much on how much data is coming through, but on the
equipment itself.
“We see what type of power their power supplies are generating and make sure we
are supplying at least that much to back them up in the case of a power outage
or power inconsistencies, allowing some room for growth,” she explains.
One of the tips she recommends is selecting a modular unit that can be upgraded
with more capacity later. “
“There are modular designs that allow the customer to start smaller and add to
the UPS-based purchase to add capacity and battery run time,” she says. “So
instead of having to buy a new UPS, they can make changes to it instead of
having to completely reinvest.”
Another tip is selecting a UPS that has an IP address so it can be communicated
with over the network. “Most UPSs are networkable, so you can monitor any kind
of power problems that might be happening,” Mroczka notes. “They configure the
UPS to alert you when there are changes.”
She also recommends wiring a UPS for its full capacity. “When it’s being
installed, it makes a lot of sense to wire for the highest capacity you think
you’ll ever use rather than just for what you’re doing now,” Mroczka advises.
UPSs also can be a profit item when added to a job.
“There’s potential add-on business just replacing batteries every year,”
asserts Randy Smith, president of Winsted Corp., Minneapolis. “It keeps you in
contact with your end user.
“The one thing I say in a lunch-and-learn or sales meeting is that this is an
opportunity obviously for the integrator to make money,” Smith continues.
“Often an integrator is so worried about being competitive, it’s these items
they leave out, but it makes the system more functional.
“When I’m talking to integrators about this, it’s amazing that they don’t get
involved,” Smith maintains. “That’s what we’ve been doing — just educating the
integrator how important it is. It is easier to talk to the end user about it,
and if the IT manager is involved, he’s all about backing up his data.”
Sidebar: Have IT Handle Storage
Alan Kruglak, senior vice president of Genesis
Security Systems LLC, Potomac, Md., recommends that an end user’s IT department
purchase and maintain all of the data storage.
“Most IT firms will require it in order to maintain both security and
standards,” Kruglak maintains. “For an integrator, the margins on a commodity
product like storage are very low. We add very little value when it comes to
storage.”
Michael Glasser, PSP CISSP, an engineer for Deterrent Technologies Inc., Ocean,
N.J., also suggests delegating storage.
“I’d like the IT department to take ownership of almost everything,” he
asserts. “I’d like to provide them with services and software – smarts and
parts rather than switches. I want to provide them with our knowledge and our
value-added services for the specific piece of the puzzle that we fill, not the
whole IT data storage package.”
Sidebar: Proposal Should Specify Retention Time
“Storage calculations unfortunately are not the
exact science they should be,” concedes Cynthia Freschi, president of North
American Video, Brick, N.J. “If asked where I find the most problems and
confusions, the answer would definitely be storage.”
North American Video has specialized in gaming security and surveillance, which
usually is 24/7, she notes. “Manufacturers try to stay competitive, and storage
is the most expensive part of the system,” she points out. “I have found many
different individuals and some ‘experts’ try to ‘guesstimate’ the motion in a
casino to determine adequate storage, but have yet to see one succeed.”
She suggests including in proposals the number of days the video will be
retained, such as, “System to record 512 cameras at 4 CIF RAID 5 for no less
than seven days.”
“Forget how many terabytes you are buying,” she recommends. “In your proposal,
make sure it clearly spells out your desired storage retention so you are
covered should it be under-specified.”
Sidebar: Try Hierarchical Management
Ted Hayduk, senior solutions architect for IP
video surveillance practice, Mainline Information Systems Inc., Tallahassee,
Fla., thinks putting storage at the edge of a network is a good idea. He also
thinks storage is not a solution in a box, like a DVR, but should be a network
solution, like an NVR.
Hayduk gives an example of how network storage can simplify a video
installation that was using 14 DVRs. His company moved all the storage for 200
surveillance cameras to three network servers.
He also recommends hierarchical storage management (HSM) systems, in which
software locates stored data whether it still is on a hard drive or whether it
is archived on digital tape. Such systems can use an automated tape management
system to retrieve tapes seamlessly, he maintains.
“HSM is a technique applicable to a variety of different storage devices and
architectures,” Hayduk explains. Data on a high-speed disk that is not accessed
for a set period of time, such as 30 days, is moved to a different storage
architecture that is lower cost but not as quickly available.
“If it is put into a tape device, even though it is a live index, HSM fools the
subsystem that it’s all stored in a contiguous place, whereas you’re storing it
in different places, and you have a piece of software that keeps track of
that,” he relates.
|