Home
  Subscribe to eNewsletter
  Online
  Breaking News
  Daily News
  eNewsletter Archive
  Laura's Blog
  Bill’s Blog
  Classified
  Jobs
  Digital Edition
  Webinars
  Showrooms
  SecurityMag.com
  SmartHome Mag.com
  Print
  Subscribe
  SDM’s Current Issue
  Technology @ Work
  5 Minute Tech Quiz
  Technology Solutions & Skills
  Networkings
  Product Reviews
  Plain Talk
  Security & The Law
  SDM 100
  Top Systems Integrators
  Field Guides & Directories
  Annual Buyers Guide
  Monitoring Field Guide
  Annual Guide to Monitoring
  Annual Guide to Distributors
  Access Control
  Events
  SDM 100 Gala
  Securing New Ground
  Security 500
  SecurityXchange for Integrators
  SecurityXchange Enterprise
  Resources
  Online Reader Service
  Archives
  Career Center
  Event Calendar
  White Papers
  List Rental
  Awards
  Dealer of the Year
  Systems Integrator of the Year
  NBFFA First Line of Defense
  Integrator of the Year Entry Form
  Dealer of the Year Entry Form
  Info
  Contact Us
  Marketing Services
  Media Planner
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Dealer Installs Virtual ‘Guard Watch’ for Neighborhood
by Russ Gager
March 14, 2006

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShareshare Use



An established neighborhood in the Richland Park Estates subdivision in Dallas has installed an innovative video surveillance system for Neighborhood Watch use by residents.

Rather than wiring the entire subdivision for video, Internet protocol (IP) cameras are wired into the broadband connections of the homes to which they are closest. Then the output is viewed on a Web site accessible only to members of the subdivision’s Neighborhood Watch group.

No central station is used. An all-volunteer team of subdivision residents trained by the Dallas police watches the video, asserted Dick Becker, president of the Richland Park Estates Homeowners Association. If they see suspicious activity, they call 911, Becker explained. “Any movement on any camera is recorded,” he noted.

A higher crime rate in the subdivision than in other areas of Dallas motivated residents to seek increased security, Becker noted. He estimated that during a 15-week period, his subdivision had the highest crime rate as a percentage in Dallas for approximately seven weeks.

Most were petty crimes, such as theft of computers, consumer electronics, jewelry and anything else that can be sold quickly for cash. The neighborhood’s size is only six blocks by three blocks, Becker calculated.

Before installation of the video system, the subdivision already had its own Neighborhood Watch group. “We have a fantastic crime watch group that does their job, but they can only do so much -- they can’t be out there 24 hours a day, seven days a week,” Becker declared.

An unguarded fence surrounds the community and security lights were installed around the perimeter, but residents felt more was needed when the crime figures were released, Becker related.

Proposals from armed security guards were received. “The problem was that their prices were anywhere from $700 a month to $1,500 a month for two quick passes through the neighborhood each night -- that doesn’t cover too much,” he said.

Becker does not remember who suggested video cameras, but several companies bid, and the second proposal from Omni-Watch Systems, Garland, Texas, was selected almost unanimously by the 55 people at the meeting.

“We have 141 houses, so I’d say one-third of the houses were represented,” Becker estimated. “That’s the most turnout we’ve ever had for a meeting.”

Only one person did not vote for the cameras, Becker said. The system will cost each homeowner a one-time $50 fee plus the monthly Internet access fee. The entire eight-camera system cost nearly $9,000.

“We’re using a combination of IP cameras and Web transmitters,” explained Butch Davis, president of Omni-Watch and Rapid Response Systems also of Garland, Texas, which is the installing dealer for this job. “We have a custom-designed user interface that ties all the cameras together into a package.”

Access to the interface is tightly controlled through user names and passwords that are given only to crime watch participants. The system uses 500 gigabytes of storage for two to three weeks of video, Davis estimated.

“Our normal system would store the data at our data center, but they also wanted an active copy if they needed to pass it on to the police,” Davis said of the homeowners association. “So we built a receiving terminal at one of the director’s homes and mirror it through our security data center so there’s images stored at two points.”

In response to concerns about invasion of privacy, Davis responded, “We’ve been very careful to place all the cameras in areas that are publicly viewable. The homeowners’ group is keeping the recorded data confined -- it’s not publicly available.”

In an online poll that accompanied an article in the Dallas Morning News about the subdivision’s use of cameras, those responding online voted 89 percent in favor of the cameras, Davis reported.



Russ Gager
gagerr@bnpmedia.com
Russ Gager is Senior Editor for SDM magazine.


Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.

Resources + Guides

Buyers GuideBuyer's Guide
Your Complete Industry Resource.

eNewsletterseNews Signups
Subscribe to our free eNewsletters.

SDM 100 SDM 100
SDM’s list of the 100 largest security installation and monitoring companies.

























© 2008 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy