This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies
By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn More
This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
SDMmag logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
SDMmag logo
  • Home
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Digital Editions
    • Archives
    • Monitoring Today
    • Professional Security Canada
  • Products
  • Newswire
  • Exclusives
    • SDM 100 Report
    • Top Systems Integrators Report
    • Annual Industry Forecast
    • State of the Market Series
    • Dealer of the Year
    • Systems Integrator of the Year
    • TMA Monitoring Center Excellence Awards
    • Blog
    • PSA Leadership Institute
  • Topics
    • Trends & Industry Issues
    • Video Solutions
    • Access Control & Identification
    • Smart Home
    • More SDM Topics
  • Columns
    • Editor's Angle
    • 5-Minute Tech Quiz
    • Security & the Law
    • Security Networkings
    • Digital Shuffle
    • Technology @ Work
    • Insider News & Business
    • Today's Systems Integrator
    • Marketing Madmen
    • Sales Stars
    • Smart Insights
  • Events
    • Industry Calendar
    • SDM 100 Gala @ ESX
    • Webinars
  • More
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
    • ISC West 2019
    • Photo Galleries
    • Newsletters
    • Classified Ads
    • SDM Store
    • White Papers
    • Sponsor Insights
    • More Resources
  • Directories
    • Buyers Guide
    • Take a Tour
    • Guide to Distributors
    • Guide to Central Stations & Monitoring
  • Contact
  • Advertise
Home » San Jose PD Stops Responding to Unverified Alarms; CAA & SIAC Observe Public Safety Threat
Standards, Regulations & Legislation

San Jose PD Stops Responding to Unverified Alarms; CAA & SIAC Observe Public Safety Threat

Exclusives Feature Image
January 26, 2012
Sabrina Gasulla
KEYWORDS alarm company / non-response policy / unverified alarms
Reprints
No Comments

Two U.S. cities announced new non-response policies for unverified alarms in 2011. The Detroit Police Department enacted its policy in August and the San Jose, Calif. PD, followed by announcing a very similar plan a few days before Christmas. As law enforcement budgets are cut across the country and many look to reduce false alarm dispatches to boost efficiency, California and Michigan alarm companies are not the only ones watching these policies.

San Jose is the newest city to employ a non-response protocol for unverified alarms. And alarm companies operating in the area are still reeling from the break-neck speed at which the decision was made and implemented by the city’s law enforcement officials. The SJPD informed citizens and alarm companies on Dec. 21, 2011 that effective Jan. 1, 2012, the department would not respond to residential or commercial alarms where the monitoring station calling for dispatch did not have positive confirmation that a crime was in progress or had already occurred.

The SJPD described a verified alarm as one accompanied by either an eyewitness (a guard or alarm company-affiliated personnel or a property owner, for example) account from the scene, or by remote video or audio footage reviewed by the monitoring company. The Department does state on its website (http://www.sjpd.org/records/Verified_Response.html) that it will continue to respond to human-activated panic, duress and robbery alarms. The Detroit PD has a similar concept of a verified alarm. But neither agency has official language admitting alarms verified through enhanced call verification (ECV).

Jerry Lenander, executive director of the California Alarm Association (CAA), commented that San Jose residents had very little time to prepare for the new policy. “The key issue is that it was very short notice that they were not going to respond to alarms. It just left the business owners and homeowners in the lurch. All we really wanted then was some kind of extension to allow the business owners and homeowners to make arrangements — do an assessment and secure their property.”

Jon Sargent, Industry/Law Enforcement Liaison for SIAC, told SDM that SIAC spent several months working with the SJPD, starting in April 2011, sharing SIAC’s false alarm reduction model (centered on ECV and a fine schedule for frequent false alarms) and the positive results garnered in cities that implemented it. The SJPD does cite research as a basis for its new policy. According to the Department, 98 percent of the alarms police responded to in 2008 were false, with only 113 resulting in police reports and two leading to arrests. Sargent and Lenander both pointed out the SJPD used 4-year-old research that dates back before ECV hit its stride.

Alarm companies affected by the new non-response policy will come together at a CAA Silicon Valley local chapter meeting on Feb. 1 to discuss the issue, how their businesses have been affected, and best practices to continue providing their customers with valuable services.

Due to the sudden policy change, local companies have had to quickly adapt and Lenander says it’s critical that everyone is on the same page. “There’s confusion now as to what the policy is and what [the Police] are doing,” he said. “And what alarm companies and central stations are supposed to do. Do you dispatch? Do you not dispatch? What do you do?”

Sargent added, “Some companies are adding patrol, which is being charged to the customers, to go verify alarms. It’s a shame because it’s creating a situation where somebody has to go and see that a crime is in progress or already has occurred before the police will go. SIAC knows that in the past in some municipalities such as Dallas — and I think this will be another Dallas — there are some citizens that will respond to their own alarms. They don’t want to pay for a patrol person to go their business or home. And it’s a public safety issue. The city has made a decision and we’re concerned for our customers and the serious issues this has caused.”

Lenander and Sargent will both be present at the Silicon Valley chapter meeting on Feb. 1 and hope to dispel some of those doubts. Sargent stressed that a policy adopted by a local police department is not municipal law and does not affect the contract between a property owner and their alarm company. “Most if not all of the security companies are going to call the San Jose Police. Many of the local companies already practice enhanced call verification. They’ll make a couple of phone calls, which has been proven to reduce false alarms, and notifying the police.”

Stan Martin, executive director at SIAC, commented that the situation in San Jose is very reminiscent of what happened in Detroit last year. When a police department was looking to better manage false alarms, SIAC and local associations worked with the Police Department to explore options that made continued response to alarms a more sustainable practice. In the end, the city chose a different plan with no input from the alarm industry. In the case of Detroit, the city did implement the plan for a few months, but chose to switch to a non-response plan. Martin explained, “With enhanced call verification, [Detroit] had already had one round of reductions. Our recommendation was to update the ordinance and get a law in the books that would bring in revenue from permits and fines and further significantly reduce alarm dispatches. This is a program that we know works. We’re seeing 60 to 70 percent reduction [of false alarms] the first year in this program and in year two and three and four, depending on how aggressive the city wants to be, we can go to 80 to 90 percent reductions in dispatches and making substantial revenue from the people that are using the service. It’s a formula that 99 percent of the cities accept and they like it. And it works.”

 

 

Subscribe to SDM Magazine

Recent Articles by Sabrina Gasulla

Central Station Manager Best Practices

November 2013 Digital Shuffle

August 2013 Digital Shuffle

Digital Shuffle- July 2013

DirecTV’s Acquisition of LifeShield Could Set It Apart From Other ‘Bundled Services’ Competitors

Related Articles

San Jose, Calif. Drops Verified Response Program After Spike in Burglaries

Sandy Springs Revokes Response to 39 Alarm Companies in Response to SIAC’s Challenge

Maryland Town Seeks to Improve Public Safety with HD Megapixel Cameras

Burglar Alarm Responding Sheriff Causes Traffic Accident — Was he Liable?

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Subscribe For Free!
  • Print & Digital Edition Subscriptions
  • SDM eNewsletter & Other eNews Alerts
  • Online Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content What Is Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the SDM audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep.

Close
Featureimage_900x550__ovl0jlkbbj__
Sponsored By
Schneider Electric

New Digital Load Management System Drives Productivity and Enables New Business Models

Motor starter selection and configuration has always been a labor-intensive task. To address this challenge, machine builders and system integrators must adopt new technologies that simplify motor starter selection, installation, configuration and maintenance.

Popular Stories

Dealer of the Year(2019)

SDM 2019 Dealer of the Year: CPI Security of Charlotte, NC

ACT365-ipad

3 Reasons You Should Be Offering Cloud-Based Access Control

Supreme Security Systems

Supreme Security Systems Acquires T&R Alarm Systems

STANLEY

STANLEY Security Partners With Indianapolis Colts to Honor Local ‘Security Champion’

GettyImages-1087183206

Whatever Happened to the Prediction of a Mass Extinction of Security Dealers?

SDM 2019 Top Systems Integrators Report

Events

January 1, 2030

Webinar Sponsorship Information

For webinar sponsorship information, visit www.bnpevents.com/webinars or email webinars@bnpmedia.com.

View All Submit An Event

Poll

Hiring Women in Security

Has your company made any efforts in the past year to specifically hire and/or promote women in managerial/executive positions? (Please select the best answer.)
View Results Poll Archive

Products

Contemporary Security Management, 4th Edition

Contemporary Security Management, 4th Edition

 Contemporary Security Management, 3rd Edition teaches security professionals how to operate an efficient security department and how to integrate smoothly with other groups inside and outside their own organizations. 

See More Products

SDM Magazine

_FC_SDM1219 cover 144x192

2019 December

Check out SDM Magazine’s December 2019 issue, featuring "CPI’s Key to Success Is Controlling ‘the Experience’ in-House", "Monitoring Services: The Cutting Edge", and much more.

Check back throughout the month for new content!

View More Create Account
  • Resources
    • List Rental
    • Online Exclusives
    • Industry Innovations
    • Partners
    • Privacy Policy
    • Survey And Sample
  • Want More
    • Subscribe
    • Connect

Copyright ©2019. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing