Honeywell recently released survey results that reveal how some organizations are integrating physical security measures such as video surveillance and access control with traditional IT security systems. According to “Enterprise Threat Management and Security Convergence: A Benchmarking Study,” significant barriers still exist that prevent organizations from converging their systems and many of these organizations remain conflicted on how to best attain optimal results.

 

More than 50 chief information officers, chief security officers and chief information and security officers of U.S.-based global companies with revenues from $1 billion to more than $100 billion participated in the survey.

 

“The convergence of physical and traditional IT systems can provide compelling security benefits for an enterprise,” said Mark Diodati, Identity and Privacy Strategies senior analyst with Burton Group. “Successful compliance initiatives can be enhanced when the organization adopts a holistic approach for managing access to these systems.”

 

Most respondents indicated increased interaction between their security and IT functions:

The majority of respondents (nearly 73 percent) believe vulnerabilities in either physical or IT security can lead to a breach in the other system:

“This study reinforces that companies are increasingly concerned with protecting their information assets as well as their physical assets, and they recognize that integrating once-disparate systems can be effective in addressing threats,” said Jim Ebzery, senior vice president of Identity and Security Management at Novell, which recently collaborated with Honeywell to develop a converged physical-IT security system. “How they choose to implement convergence varies on a number of factors including internal roles and overall attitudes about its effectiveness.”

 

When asked whether having physical security systems on IT backbones is a security risk, the answers were split: 59 percent said "no" while 42 percent said "yes." The results also differed with regards to personal responsibility for organizing responses to a coordinated physical-IT security attack:

When asked to define “convergence,” responses varied from using IT backbones for security systems to automating manual processes through an IT system. Additional responses included the strategic partnership of physical and IT security organizations in risk management. Although these responses varied, they reinforced existing research.

 

For example, in the Feb. 22, 2008 report “Let’s Get Logical: The Convergence of Physical Access Control and Identity Systems” by the Burton Group, Diodati wrote, “The convergence of physical and logical systems has many moving parts. In addition, a convergence end state may look very different depending on an organization’s goals.”

 

Thirty-three percent of respondents said they envision convergence happening within their organizations in the next two to five years, while another 33 percent said convergence will never happen. The barriers associated with true convergence include: Turf control, complexity and skills needed to handle multiple disciplines, budget conflicts, compatibility across groups, lack of technical platforms and expanding privacy laws.

 

“A multitude of elements must be in place for convergence to truly improve overall security and streamline internal business processes,” said John Lorenty, Honeywell Systems Group president. “A strong IT backbone and common protocols are essential for convergence to be effective. Most importantly, a strong partnership between cross-functional teams is critical to ensure that a converged solution meets the challenges of ever-evolving threats.”

 

The study’s margin of error is plus/minus 2 percent.

 

For more information about “Enterprise Threat Management and Security Convergence: A Benchmarking Survey,” please visit www.honeywellintegrated.com