SDMmag logo
search
Go to Ask SDM AI
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
SDMmag logo
  • NEWS
  • PRODUCTS
  • TOPICS
    • Access Control & Identification
    • Integration & Network Solutions
    • Life Safety & Fire Alarm
    • Monitoring
    • Smart Home
    • Trends & Industry Issues
    • Video Solutions
  • COLUMNS
    • Digital Shuffle
    • Editor's Angle
    • Insider News & Business
    • Integration Spotlight
    • Marketing Madmen
    • Security & the Law
    • Security Comings & Goings
    • Security Networkings
    • Technology @ Work
    • Technology Solutions & Skills
    • SIA Waypoints
    • Cybersecurity Chronicle
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Annual Industry Forecast
    • Dealer of the Year
    • Project of the Year
    • SDM 100
    • State of the Market Series
    • Systems Integrator of the Year
    • Top Systems Integrator Report
    • TMA Excellence Awards
  • BLOG
  • MEDIA
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
    • Polls
    • White Papers
  • EVENTS
    • Industry Calendar
    • Webinars
  • MORE
    • Classified Ads
    • Newsletters
    • SDM Store
    • State of Security eBook
    • Sponsored Insights
  • BUYERS GUIDE
    • Buyers Guide
    • Take a Tour
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issues
    • Monitoring Today
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!
MonitoringStandards, Regulations & LegislationMonitoring Today

Central Station Monitoring Standards

Underwriters Laboratories explains why UL 1981 and UL 827, standards that cover central station facilities and services, are being updated to reflect the times.

By Pete Tallman
January 23, 2014

UL’s relationship with the alarm industry spans more than 90 years. At the outset, Underwriters Laboratories was asked by both the alarm and insurance industries to develop a means for defining alarm services and uniform performance of equipment. In those days central stations built equipment and designed facilities based on their business goals. Although the industry was more than 50 years old, at the time there were significant variations in the delivery of central station service and performance of the equipment. The first UL central station standard was developed in 1924 with substantial input from stakeholders in both industries. Central stations brought an innovative perspective to the table, insurance concerns were focused on loss control and UL created the performance criteria. The collaboration between these three stakeholders has sustained a balance in UL’s standards that continues today.

However, how will standards keep up with the current wave of innovation that has been growing over the last decade and shows no sign of cresting? A number of years ago, it was recognized that the Standard for Central-Station Automation Systems, UL 1981, was in need of an update to address changes in the way automation systems are being used. In addition, it was clear many of the requirements in that standard address how the automation system is configured in a central station, and thus were more applicable to the Standard for Central-Station Alarm Services, UL 827.

Furthermore, the way central stations operate, the types and quantity of systems they monitor, and the potential impact of natural disasters and utility outages they can experience were changing significantly.  As a result, UL formed an Industry Task Group for each standard that was comprised of software providers, operators of central stations and UL staff. Central station representation on task groups was intentionally a mixture of representatives of providers of wholesale monitoring services, along with nationally based and independent providers of full service. Because some requirements were going to shift from UL 1981 to UL 827, a correlating committee consisting of selected members of each task group also was formed to assure that both documents were harmonized. Many of the initial items that were cited as needing to be addressed came from the UL engineering and audit staff. But, once the task groups met, there was an infusion of creative ideas for the use of emerging technology. In the end, a remarkable collaboration developed within each task group.

As part of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), process drafts of each standard will be released for review, comment and vote by UL’s Standards Technical Panel (STP) for Alarm System Services. Manufacturers of Certified software and operators of Certified central stations that use the standards also are able to review and comment on the proposals scheduled to be released in December 2013 by registering at UL’s Standards Certification Customer Library. Details on the process are explained in the related sidebar, “How to Get Involved,” on page 26.

In addition to moving the central station specific requirements to UL 827, some of the key proposals for UL 1981 include the following:

  • A common section was created for automation system access security. This includes both external access and program access levels.
  • Equipment redundancy includes options for the use of fault-tolerant equipment as well as clustering and methods of virtualization.
  • Computer equipment is required to be designed as high-availability systems, with duplication of key components.
  • The software is required to be capable of producing statistical reports by monitored system type.
  • The security of connections to the system by service technicians, subscribers and the like is described.
  • An automation system check sheet was created in the Appendix to aid software providers in preparing for an evaluation of their products.

The proposals for UL 827 cover not only an expanded discussion of the use of automation systems but also new options and techniques to provide more flexibility in the delivery of central station services. These proposals reflect advances in technology, industry practices, local environmental concerns and disaster planning. In many cases, they are proposals to address issues that are not currently described in the standard, but are becoming commonplace in central station today.

Some of the key proposals are:

• A calculation known as a Monitoring Equivalent Weight (MEW) factor, based on the types of alarm systems that are monitored, replaces fixed thresholds of monitored accounts as the means to determine the configuration of hardware and infrastructure needed to support reliable monitoring.

• As the MEW increases, duplication of the computer system, use of a tertiary system, and locating the tertiary in a separate facility are required. At the highest level of MEW the tertiary system is required to be located in a facility operated by either the central station, another central station or by the provider of the alarm monitoring software. In the last case a new category of Certification known as Central Station Host Services has been created for software providers.

Looking for quick answers on security topics? Try Ask SDM, our new smart AI search tool. Ask SDM →

• As is the case in UL 1981, the computer equipment is required to be designed as high-availability systems, with duplication of key components. Equipment redundancy includes options for the use of fault-tolerant equipment as well as clustering and methods of virtualization.

• Power supply requirements have been expanded with revisions to the sections on testing standby power supplies, continuity of power and UPS units. A new section addressing electrical transient protection for supply line, signaling and communication line protection has been added.

• The options for the physical security of entrances to operating rooms have been expanded to allow alternate types of doors and identification means.

• A new section known as remote signal management center addresses the use of remote sites from which operators process signals.

• The section on cable systems has been renamed and expanded to cover cable of wire or optic fiber, antennas or other wireless methods, and equipment such as switches, routers, servers and the like through which signals and voice communication essential for the operation of the central station pass.

• New requirements were developed for the use of temporary facilities in the event of a disaster and the actions taken if communication with public safety organizations is disrupted.

While these lists only touch on the more significant proposals, they do convey the objectives for the next editions of UL 827 and UL 1981. The fundamental goal was to shape these documents in a way that will allow them to move in closer synchronization with the innovations of manufacturers and central stations, while balancing the concerns of authorities having jurisdiction. As such, many of the requirements are written with a performance objective rather than prescriptively. For example, the use of virtualization is intended to offer central stations choices for efficiency of operation, provided they do not degrade the reliability of operation with a single point of failure.

From UL’s perspective, the work on these standards underscores the value of industry and AHJ participation. In view of the fast pace of emerging technology and its envisioned applications, task groups and similar forums will be the means by which performance criteria can be developed as new products make their way to market. ?

 

About the Author

Pete Tallman is senior staff engineer at Underwriters Laboratories.

 

 

SIDEBAR 1

 

How to Get Involved

 

If you are a manufacturer, a central station or another active certification client you are eligible for free access to UL standards, revisions and proposals. If you are not currently receiving them, you can contact UL Standards customer service team by calling 888-853-3503 or by sending an email to clientservices@comm-2000.com and you will receive a username and password.

 If you are not a subscriber or a certification client, you may purchase a subscription to any standards that are of interest. UL Standards and associated proposal bulletins are distributed by Comm-2000. Standards, bulletins and subscriptions are available for purchase via the internet at the following website: www.comm-2000.com. 

KEYWORDS: monitoring services security standards

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • SDM 100

    SDM 100: Top 100 Security Dealers of 2026

    The top 100 security dealers navigated a complex...
    Exclusives
    By: Karyn Hodgson
  • Security camera

    State of the Market: Video Surveillance

    As video surveillance shifts from siloed systems to...
    State of the Market Series
    By: Brianna Wilson
  • 2026 Industry Forecast

    SDM 2026 INDUSTRY FORECAST

    Rapid technology advances meet shifting economic...
    Trends & Industry Issues
    By: Karyn Hodgson
Manage My Account
  • SDM Newsletters
  • Online Registration
  • eMagazine Subscriptions
  • Subscription Customer Service
  • Manage My Preferences

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the SDM audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of SDM or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • Doctor examining child patient with mother present in medical clinic
    Sponsored byHID

    The Human Side of Hospital Security: How Modern Visitor Management Protects People First

Popular Stories

Video surveillance camera

Why Video Health Monitoring Is a ‘No Brainer’

ESA Board of Directors Q2 26 Elections

Electronic Security Association Announces 2026 Board of Directors Election Results

TMA & SDM Logos

Becklar, Elite & Puget Win 2026 TMA/SDM Monitoring Center Excellence Awards

SDM Dealer of the Year 2026 Promotion

Poll

What’s the most promising trend in the industry?

What’s the most promising trend in the industry?
View Results Poll Archive

Products

Physical Security Assessment Handbook An Insider’s Guide to Securing a Business

Physical Security Assessment Handbook An Insider’s Guide to Securing a Business

See More Products
SDM 100 2026 Rankings

Related Articles

  • Central Station and Monitoring Standards

    See More
  • peter_g

    Central Station Monitoring Redundancy

    See More
  • CSAA Award Winners Show What It Takes to Take Central Station Monitoring to the Next Level

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • surveillance.jpg

    Surveillance, Privacy and Public Space

  • 9780367667887.jpg

    Surveillance, Privacy and Security

  • 9780367030407.jpg

    National Security, Personal Privacy and the Law

See More Products

Events

View AllSubmit An Event
  • September 25, 2025

    Cloud or On-Premise: Navigating Access Control and Cybersecurity Choices

    ON DEMAND: Security technology is rapidly evolving — and so are the threats. In this webinar, we'll examine the advantages and trade-offs of cloud-based and on-premise solutions, offering clarity for integrators, consultants and end users.
View AllSubmit An Event
×

Be in the forefront of security intelligence when you receive SDM.

Join over 10,000+ professionals when you subscribe today.

SIGN UP TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • Newsletter
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing