This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies
By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn More
This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
SDMmag logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
SDMmag logo
  • Home
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Digital Editions
    • Archives
    • Monitoring Today
    • Professional Security Canada
  • Products
  • Newswire
  • Exclusives
    • SDM 100 Report
    • Top Systems Integrators Report
    • Annual Industry Forecast
    • State of the Market Series
    • Dealer of the Year
    • Systems Integrator of the Year
    • TMA Monitoring Center Excellence Awards
    • Blog
    • PSA Leadership Institute
  • Topics
    • Trends & Industry Issues
    • Video Solutions
    • Access Control & Identification
    • Smart Home
    • More SDM Topics
  • Columns
    • Editor's Angle
    • 5-Minute Tech Quiz
    • Security & the Law
    • Security Networkings
    • Digital Shuffle
    • Technology @ Work
    • Insider News & Business
    • Today's Systems Integrator
    • Marketing Madmen
    • Sales Stars
    • Smart Insights
  • Events
    • Industry Calendar
    • SDM 100 Gala @ ESX
    • Webinars
  • More
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
    • ISC West 2019
    • Photo Galleries
    • Newsletters
    • Classified Ads
    • SDM Store
    • White Papers
    • Sponsor Insights
    • More Resources
  • Directories
    • Buyers Guide
    • Take a Tour
    • Guide to Distributors
    • Guide to Central Stations & Monitoring
  • Contact
  • Advertise
Home » Motion to Compel Arbitration Hinged on Interstate Commerce
SDM TopicsSecurity & the LawColumnsIntrusion AlarmMonitoring

Motion to Compel Arbitration Hinged on Interstate Commerce

Security & the Law Default
February 1, 2018
Lessing E. Gold
KEYWORDS perimeter security / security agreements / security dealers
Reprints
No Comments

A recent case in Arizona dealt with the issue of whether an arbitration provision in an employment agreement can be enforced.

The plaintiff, a security and patrol company, hired a general manager who signed an employment agreement stating that, “If litigation is initiated in any manner, by either party, pertaining to this agreement, both employer and employee agree to submit to binding arbitration under the jurisdiction of the courts of Maricopa County, Ariz.”

The general manager and several other employees subsequently resigned and started their own security company. According to the plaintiff, they then induced other employees to leave, causing a “massive walk-off of employees that resulted in the inability of the plaintiff to provide adequate security services from multiple existing contracts.” In addition, the plaintiff alleged that the defendants acted in ways detrimental to the plaintiff before resigning, by informing other employees that the plaintiff had changed its name to the name of the defendant; misrepresenting to clients that the plaintiff had changed its name or that the plaintiff and defendant were one and the same; and using the plaintiff’s property, financial resources, and proprietary information for the benefit of the defendant.

The plaintiff filed a complaint in the superior court alleging breach of contract against the general manager and tortious interference with contract breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, civil conspiracy, and direct officer liability against the defendants. The defendants filed a motion to compel arbitration based on the general manager’s employment agreement. They acknowledged that only the general manager was bound by the employment agreement, but sought to compel arbitration for all of the parties. The superior court denied the motion to compel arbitration.

The defendants appealed, claiming that Arizona law was preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), which applies to employment agreements, therefore requiring the plaintiff to arbitrate. The FAA was enacted to overcome “judicial hostility to arbitration agreements … and to place arbitration agreements upon the same footing as other contracts.”

The Arizona Supreme Court recognized that the FAA “preempts state law and governs all written arbitration agreements involving interstate commerce, making such agreements enforceable in both federal and state courts.” Under the FAA, the courts must stay litigation of arbitrable claims pending arbitration and must compel arbitration in accordance with the terms of the contract.

But the court pointed out that the party moving for arbitration has the burden of proving the existence of a contract containing an arbitration clause, in a transaction that substantially affects interstate commerce. If the party moving to compel arbitration fails to make such a showing, the motion should be denied.

In the defendants’ motion to compel arbitration, the court noted they did not explain how the general manager’s employment substantially affects interstate commerce. The court further indicated that when the issue was raised in the lower court, the defendants stated simply that “security services could be provided to out-of-state entities and the plaintiff could purchase security supplies, such as guns or uniforms, from outside the state of Arizona. This was insufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact requiring resolution at an evidentiary hearing.

Thus the defendants failed to carry their burden of establishing that the FAA applied. The superior court denied the motion to compel arbitration.

The defendants also argued the arbitration clause was enforceable as a common law contract. The court indicated that they did not, however, make that argument in their motion to compel arbitration. The defendants included only one sentence asserting that “the language in the employment agreement is also enforceable as a common law contract term.” They offered no legal authority or factual support for that belated assertion.

Therefore, the court affirmed the denial of the defendants’ motion to compel arbitration, further stating that because the case has not been resolved on its merits, the court deferred any decision on fees to the superior court after the successful party has been identified.

 

Readers Ask

Q: We are an alarm company. How long do we have to physically maintain our subscribers’ records, opening, closing, response, etc.?

A: The statute of limitations for breach of contract or negligence varies from state to state, so it is important for you to find out what the statute of limitations might be in your particular state for negligence, breach of contract or wanton or willful activity. I would definitely recommend that you to keep all records for the period of the statute of limitations. Notwithstanding, if there has been an incident involving any of your installations, there is a claim pending, or if you are aware of any potential claim, then I would retain all of the records for that particular account until such time as the incident or claim is finally adjudicated or resolved.

Subscribe to SDM Magazine

Recent Articles by Lessing Gold

Is Alarm Company Responsible for Plaintiff’s Flood Damage?

Can Insurance Company Recoup in Fire Sprinkler Case?

Does Monitoring Contract With Tenants Entitle Building Insurance Provider to Reimbursement?

Prominent Liability Clause Protects an Alarm Company That Failed to Respond

Burglar Alarm Responding Sheriff Causes Traffic Accident — Was he Liable?

Les-gold-dscf0001

Lessing E. Gold of Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp is counsel to the California Alarm Association and a contributing legal columnist. He can be reached at sdm@bnpmedia.com.

Related Articles

Taxation & Interstate Commerce in a Monitoring Case

Security Company Seeks Arbitration Instead of Court Hearing in Contract Dispute

Taxes on ‘Monitoring’ or ‘Telecommunications’?

‘Engaged to Wait’ Or ‘Waiting to Engage’ Determines Overtime

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Subscribe For Free!
  • Print & Digital Edition Subscriptions
  • SDM eNewsletter & Other eNews Alerts
  • Online Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content What Is Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the SDM audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep.

Close
Featureimage_900x550__ovl0jlkbbj__
Sponsored By
Schneider Electric

New Digital Load Management System Drives Productivity and Enables New Business Models

Motor starter selection and configuration has always been a labor-intensive task. To address this challenge, machine builders and system integrators must adopt new technologies that simplify motor starter selection, installation, configuration and maintenance.

Popular Stories

ACT365-ipad

3 Reasons You Should Be Offering Cloud-Based Access Control

Connect Community Service

Resideo’s First Solo CONNECT Conference Puts the Focus on the Pros

Supreme Security Systems

Supreme Security Systems Acquires T&R Alarm Systems

STANLEY

STANLEY Security Partners With Indianapolis Colts to Honor Local ‘Security Champion’

ADT Commercial

ADT Commercial Purchases Critical Systems of Georgia

SDM 2019 Top Systems Integrators Report

Events

January 1, 2030

Webinar Sponsorship Information

For webinar sponsorship information, visit www.bnpevents.com/webinars or email webinars@bnpmedia.com.

View All Submit An Event

Poll

Hiring Women in Security

Has your company made any efforts in the past year to specifically hire and/or promote women in managerial/executive positions? (Please select the best answer.)
View Results Poll Archive

Products

Contemporary Security Management, 4th Edition

Contemporary Security Management, 4th Edition

 Contemporary Security Management, 3rd Edition teaches security professionals how to operate an efficient security department and how to integrate smoothly with other groups inside and outside their own organizations. 

See More Products

SDM Magazine

SEC-December-2019-Cover_144px

2019 December

Check out SDM Magazine’s December 2019 issue, featuring "CPI’s Key to Success Is Controlling ‘the Experience’ in-House", "Monitoring Services: The Cutting Edge", and much more.

Check back throughout the month for new content!

View More Create Account
  • Resources
    • List Rental
    • Online Exclusives
    • Industry Innovations
    • Partners
    • Privacy Policy
    • Survey And Sample
  • Want More
    • Subscribe
    • Connect

Copyright ©2019. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing